Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Career Derailment Profile

Eight Drivers that Derail Careers
Our career may be progressing smoothly with our career goals largely achieved and our future career prospects remain bright. However, this is not a guarantee that we are forever successful at our workplace and in our work life. We may be hit by a snag that slows down or even halt advancement entirely.

Sometimes, we become aware of these when we saw our peers progressing ahead of us but we do not know the way out of the situation. At other times, we only know we are unhappy and stressed by events that we feel we have no control over but yet we are never able to pinpoint accurately the source behind these. When you are afflicted by these experiences, it means your career may have been derailed and you need to know how to put it back on track.

This profile highlights the drivers that may help explain the challenges you may be facing with the growth and development of your career. This could be used as a early warning device informing you of your propensity for derailment. Each driver is coded to provide you with a colour indication of the likelihood of you being derailed in your career and the drivers behind this propensity. It could also used to highlight the prevailing reasons for the slowing down or halting in your career progression.

The eight drivers and Slideshare that derail careers are presented below:

Skill Fit

Talks about the fit between the skills we process and the skills required to complete the tasks in the job.

Judgement

Refers to the quality of the discourse you engaged with others prior to reaching a decision.

Radar

Indicates the frequency your network informs you of the developments that are taking place in your organisation.

Style Fit

Points to the fit between your personal style at work with those of your supervisors, peers and subordinates. Style at work is formulated by the way you relate to other, use information, reach your decisions, and organise yourself.

Branding

Shows how reputable and well-known you are amongst your superiors, peers and subordinates in terms of your ability to get things done and the value you created for your organisation.

Relationship

Tells about the quality of your relationships you have wlth your superiors, colleagues, and peers.

Job Choice

Informs you if your job and the experience it provides bring you a step closer in realising your personal aspirations

Balanced Life

States the level of integration you have achieved between your work and your personal life.

This article was 1st written on 19 May 2009 and updated on 17 Aug 2010.
Copyright 2009 & 2010. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Competencies of Effective Team Players

The leader has always been expected to play a pivotal role in making things work in the team. He does this by guiding its resources and creative potentials to deliver the outcomes expected from him to justly for the existence of the team.

To deliver these outcomes, it is always thought that one of the key roles and responsibilities of the leader is to develop his team so that its members acquire the skills and competencies necessary for its success.

However, as more Generation Y’s begin their careers in the workplace, this traditional perspective is fast becoming obsolete. Generation Y recognises the importance of being employable and trusted by their superiors, and is more likely to leave if these growth and independence factors are missing at the workplace.

Given these inclinations, it is no longer true that the success of the team is entirely dependent on the effectiveness of its leader. Each member in the team wants a say about the future of the team. They want to lead at the appropriate moment. They want to contribute as thinking value-adding entities rather than a mere factor of production.

Given this atmosphere of change, new competencies and practices of a team member begin to emerge and these are the ability to:

  • Tap into the wisdom of the crowd

  • Celebrate contributions authentically

  • Understand ourselves

  • Leverage on the diversity around us

  • Being heedfully considerate

  • Continuously acknowledge, accept, and inspire the Self

  • Honour our words

Tap into the Wisdom of the Crowd

The democratisation of information and knowledge, and the freedom of labour to bring their talent to where knowledge could be created are changing the world. This is globalisation. These are the effects of the Internet and mindsets of Generation Y, who are beginning to dominate the workplace.

This means knowledge and talent no longer a privilege only available and accessible to a few. The power has shifted into the hands of the majority. This is community power in action and it means that information, knowledge and talent is freely available out there. We need to know the methods to tap into this wisdom to be successful.

We need to recognise this phenomenon. We need to acquire a mindset that is congruent with the world and skills to collect and expand knowledge. One of such skills is the facilitation of conversations with others.

There are two basic elements in facilitating a conversation - Questioning and Paraphrasing.

In questioning, we use a number of questioning techniques to draw our counterpart into a conversation and in the process we uncover his intensions and learn of his knowledge. In paraphrasing, we summarise pieces of the conversation in our words and present it back to the audience for verification, confirmation and expansion.

When we are able to do these effectively and do them regularly, we are more capable of uncovering the opportunities of creating breakthroughs in our endeavours.

Celebrate Contribution Authentically

When we celebrate success, we make an attempt to present a deserving individual on stage to an audience and to have him receive an award from someone senior in the organisation to recognise, honour and celebrate his deeds. We spend time, efforts and money to recognise and reward individuals who had done a really good job. However, this is not an authentic celebration and the awardees know it. They is not stupid. Why is this so?

This is because we celebrate his success in our perspective as organisers of the event. In doing so, the celebration is not about him. The event is actually meant for us to demonstrate to the world that we are an enlightened organisation. We are celebrating for our sake and not for anyone else. This is inauthentic.

To truly celebrate, we have to understand the awardees’ reasons for wanting to be honoured. To answer this question, we need to ask 'why do we want to be celebrated?'

We want to be celebrated because we crave for positive feedback and affirmation from others. We want to know if we are moving in the right direction. A positive feedback is a strong incentive for inspiring us to do better and an affirmation is enough to motivate us to commit further. We stay driven this way.

Feedback and affirmation that inspires and creates aspirations are usually expressed in language. However, many organisations choose not to feedback or affirm in the most powerful way. Instead, they create symbols in their place; in the forms of scrolls, plaques, trophies, medals, ceremonial events and photo opportunities. These have their own power as they are capable of visibly demonstrate the importance that the occasion and the organisation behind the event. However, the message is not one of feedback or affirmation. They are lost when the organisation asserts itself into the forefront and talk about itself at the expense of the awardees. This is when the true purpose of celebration is lost. This is where the awardees become aware that they are just mere instruments to enable the company to showcase the quality of its organisation.

When we see through the instrumentation in the celebration, it also spells the end of real celebration. It no longer holds the sacred purpose and meaning of feedback and affirmation, and therefore lost its effectiveness for creating inspirations and aspirations in the awardees. This means when we celebrate without thinking about the organisation and without all those instrumentation, we are then really and truly celebrating success in an authentic way.

Understanding Ourselves

Sun Tzu had said that to win any battle, we need to understand ourselves and our opponents. If we only know one and not the other, our chance of winning is fifty percentage. This chance is further reduced to zero when we do not know either.

There are many ways to know ourselves and one such ways is to understand the ways we interact with our colleagues. When we first join our organisation, we make a few observations about our surrounding and the people in it. Generally, we make two kinds of assessment - we evaluate the environment to determine it favourability and we assess for the amount of control we have over others.

By putting these two together, we can produce a two-by-two matrix, which informs us on the kinds of behaviour we should adopt at work to interact with others. This matrix provides us with four behavioural modes. These are found in the diagram below:

In dominance, we have the advantage of a favourable environment and control to dictate what could be accompanied. When our environment is positive and enabling but we lack of control over the things we want complete, we will have to change and adopt a more influencing and persuasive stance.

We become more stead fasten when we are constraint by having no control over what has to be done and the environment is not altogether supportive. In such a circumstance, being calm and steady may be the strategy to survive the situation. Finally, if the environment is negative but we have a say over what should be done, we could take on a more conscientious and calm approach in dealing with the interactions we have with our peers.

We must accept that we cannot change others but ourselves. If we are aware of ourselves and could change our behaviours with dexterity, we could increase our propensity of accomplishing our goals.

Leverage on the Diversity Around Us

New knowledge is created when existing information and knowledge is combined and recombined with other existing information and knowledge. However, because this information and knowledge resides in individuals and not within the systems, these combination and recombination activities will only happened when the people share with each other.

When we talk about diversity, we want to make use of the information and knowledge arising from many differing backgrounds, exposures and experiences as the source for generating new knowledge. This could only be afforded when there is diversity in the group and people in the group share honestly.

We rarely share honestly and usually there is not enough of diversity in the group to carry enough of information and knowledge to make the sharing and combining powerful enough. Therefore, it is not natural that the group would always have the mix of people we desired and they would share without reservation.

These have to be created by design and cultivated with time. We need skills to do these and there are six of these. These are communication, active listening, relationship building within the group and with other stakeholders, problem solving and counselling.

When we acquired these skills, we could build enough of trust with each other to share authentically and fully tap into the wisdom diversity has for the group.

Being Heedfully Considerate

When we say we will consider something, it means that we will make an effort to look at both the pros and cons of that thing and weigh them for their implications before deciding on the next course of action. This act is call considering and the evaluations produce a list of considerations. An informed decision is one made by choosing an decision option that produces the best outcomes but impact the stakeholders the least after examining these considerations.

When we are heedful to others, we make a promise to ourselves to take care of the feelings and emotions of others for each act that we are about to make. In doing so, we think not just about choosing, deciding and executing our action, we also look at whether our action will cause harm to others as well.

Therefore, heedful consideration could be seen as a game where each of us is constantly and consistently is mindful about the consequences of our actions on others, and diligently making calculations of the tradeoffs between outcomes and their impact.

If the cons is greater than the pros, the current decision choice is not workable. If the negative impact is greater than the positive outcome, this decision option may need tweaking. If the impact could not be significantly negated by other acts, another decision option must be made available.

The fundamental rule is not to carry out any course of action that we are unsure of its consequences and impact. There is always a better option in existence. We have to look for them. This is being heedfully considerate and the seed for harmonious relationships.

Continuously Acknowledge, Accept, and Inspire Ourselves

Language could present itself in many forms. Words, symbols and gestures could by themselves or in combination use as expressions of the language and we use these to express our world.

We use language to describe and perceive the world. We use language to appreciate and evaluate our environment. We also use language to interact with our surrounding. Our thoughts are created in language. This is the importance of language.

This is also the bane of language. If our thoughts are made up of negative language, our world, our choices and our behaviours become negative. This means who we are to ourselves and to others is determined by the language we use in our thoughts when we think about ourselves and of others. This calls for us to be fully aware of our thoughts and the quality of the language used in these thoughts.

No human is perfect and therefore we are fallible. We need to acknowledge and accept this true identity rather than to mask it or run away from it. However, not all of us are capable of forgiving ourselves for the errors and failures we had committed, and we beat ourselves up with the language we use on ourselves. We could call these guilt and self-blame but these are in a language we understand and we never hesitate to use it to beat ourselves up when we are unable to maintain our facade of perfection.

Life should not have to be like this. Like you, I am not unique. Like you, I fall too. Just like all creatures in the world, I have my own weaknesses and could fall. Like you, I may be able to 'cover' my tracks but there is no embarrassment and shame for not doing so and be honest about it.

By accepting ourselves for who we are, we are capable of forgiving ourselves and continuing to be inspired by the true intent we want with our lives. We are not obstructed by the ghosts of our past because we know that we are never better than anyone else. So, where is the fear when all human are equal? This awareness makes us unstoppable from being great.

When we could look beyond this need to constantly look good to ourselves and in front of others, we unlock ourselves from our constraints so that we are able to attain a higher realm of experiences and self-awareness, and these are the recipes of self-efficacy and self-fulfilment.

Honour Our Word

In our life, one way or another and no matter how hard we had tried, we will break some of the promises that we had made. These could be promises we had made to ourselves or to others.

The pain is not in breaking these promises. Breaking our promises is easy. We just do not carry out the promised act. The source of the pain is really from the guilt of knowing someone is going to be disappointed and knowing how untrue the excuses we had used to explain away these lapses.

Humans are incredible creatures. We like to avoid pain and in these instances, we deal with it by pretending that the promises never ever existed or we took the escapist route by avoiding the person we had given our promises to. Over time we forget, even for those promises we made to ourselves.

However, we do not have to live like this. We can get out of this vicious cycle of guilt and flight instinct by recognising that there is a difference between keeping to our promise and honouring our word.

In keeping to our promise, we are prone to lapses and the feeling of guilt arising from our inability to forgive ourselves. In honouring our word, we acknowledge our occasional failures of not able to deliver our promises. We are capable of articulating authentically the lapses and sought forgiveness from those we had promised.

We can restart life again because we know it is useless to bash ourselves with our guilt or run away from the people we had made promises. We know we are committed to stay on course and recognise that lapses are just transient occurrences that are part and parcel of staying committed. People who honour their words do not dwell on meaningless self-criticisms but keep looking forward and moving ahead to find opportunities to realise the word.

People who practises honouring his word stays honest to himself and remains powerful throughout his life.

This article was 1st written on 19 May 2009.
Copyright 2009. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

The Natural Laws that Govern Our World

How Breakthroughs are Different From Continuous Improvements

When we do improvements to a product, service or any other things, we are making an attempt to increase or reduce something related to it. This could be an increase in terms of the product or service's performance or its consistency in delivering its desired outcomes or the value the creation process brings to the consumers. Improvement could also come in the form of a decrease in the externalities the product or service brings to the environment or society, or a reduction in the complexities of moving it through its value chain or in lowering of prices the consumers have to bear for these products and services.

Diminishing Returns of Continuous Improvements

There will be costs in bringing about these benefits and the organisation will continue commit to doing improvement up to the point where the costs of the improvement equals to the benefits derived from it. This means that there are diminishing returns in all kinds of continuous improvement.

However, what is the driver for this and what could we do given this reality? To appreciating these, we have to first understand the natural laws that govern the technologies that create and operate the product and service, bring the product and service to the consumers, and deliver the value in the product and service to them. Let's go through this thought experiment to let me illustrate this driver to you.

Let's assume that there is a big rectangular field near our house. Surrounding this field are barbed-wired fences, and there are two gates facing each other diagonally across. These gates are linked by a L-shaped cement-paved pedestrian walkway. We have to use this walkway everyday because this is the only way to get to the train station from our house. The diagram of the houses, field, gates, walkway and train station is presented below.


Several years later, the local government had decided to improve the walkway by tearing it up and repaving it. The new walkway has shortened the distance one has to travel between the two gates. Since then, there have been no further changes except repaving works because of its wear and tear. You have written to the authorities about the needs for further improvements and they have always told you that this is the best they could come up with. Why is this so?

Constraining Effects of the Governing Laws

This comes about because there are no more ideas capable of shortening the distance. Further changes could only be motivated by a fundamental shift in the natural laws that govern the whole scheme of things. Look at our walkway again and we could see Pythagoras' Theorem (a2 + b2 = c2) as the natural law that is now defining the distance between the two gates. According to the theorem, the shortest distance between two opposing corners is directly across. The construction of all other point-to-point walkways are frivolous and a waste of public funds because nothing is shorter than this. If we could shift this natural law that governs the field, we can find new avenues for new improvements. In this thought experiment, the theorem is capable of being re-expressed to focus the equation at different perspectives but in its simplest form it is incapable of being reconfigured. This explains why the current layout is the best solution given the constraints imposed by the current law.


So, how could we identify new avenues for improvements when we are unable to instrument the natural laws? We do this by examining the variables in the natural laws. In the thought experiment, the law that dictates the length of the diagonals is the Pythagoras' Theorem and the equation is:

a2 + b2 = c2

In this equation, we know that the sum of the length and breathe of the field will always be longer than the route that cuts diagonally across the field. We also know that there is a positive relationship between its length and breathe, and its diagonal. This means, the shortening of the diagonal requires a proportionate reduction in the dimensions in either or both the length and breathe of the field, which will cause the reorientation of the opposing gates. If this is feasible, this wlll become a new source for improvement up to the point where these movements no longer have meaning.

Motivation for Breakthrough Thinking

When these dimensional entities are invariable, the diagonal is constraint and nothing could change this. Now, we need to innovate to find a breakthrough in the way we think about shortening the route. We question not about how to reduce the distance to reach the station fast. We ask about how we could reach the station quickly, and we may consider using the travellator, which allows us to expend less energy to perform the task and arrives at half the time. We have leave behind distance and adopted speed as the new mode of thinking for breakthroughs. This means, in breakthroughs, we need to become aware of and avoid being influenced by the current natural laws.

Why is this so important to the innovation practitioners? This is so because the true defining difference between do continuous improvements and creating breakthroughs rests in recognising whether we are working within the confines of a current natural law or transiting out of it to be into another. Without this awareness, we will forever be confined by the current laws and only capable of doing improvements.

This article was 1st written on 19 May 2009.
Copyright 2009. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Human Resource Investment Is Not About Spending But Creating Opportunities for Learning

Critical Facotors of Innovative Organisations No. 7

Usually, when we think about investing in people, our immediate thoughts are about training and development. While these are essential, they cannot be seen as the ends to a cause. Often, it is this misplaced emphasis that is the source of frustration for many Human Resource practitioners.

Ends Versus Means


In the 'ends' mentality, people are just sent for training and development, and it is expected that results will follow without considering what could have happened after the learning interventions. When this section of the value creation process has been truncated, Human Resource practitioners lost the mechanism to translate the learning individuals may have gained at these training and development events into human productivity at the workplace. In this space, lt is a challenge to separate the benefits of these investments from the financial results of the overall performance of the organisation. There are consequences with such a difficulty. It includes management assigning lower priorities to people development and seeking avenues with seemingly less dubious and more direct impact to productivity, like outsourcing or reconfiguration of the labour-machine mix, to improve the organisation. These will severely constraint the roles human will play in creativity and innovation in the organisation, which could lead to the decline of a nation.

Unlike the 'ends' mentality, the 'means' perspective recognises that the true value of training and development is in their transference at the workplace. There are follow-throughs that practitioners recognise as important and they put these into practice and build them into their corporate policies and governance structure to facilitate the actual transference of knowledge, skills and attitudes into creative ideas, innovations and entrepreneurial activities at the workplace. These are the financially accountable results of training and development.

Creating Opportunities for Learning
Some follow-throughs include:
  • Creating opportunities for people to interact with those who have successfully used the skills, practice what they have learnt, give them a sense of contribution, and make the skill become second nature to them.

  • Exposing the people to different roles so that they experience innovation from different perspectives. In doing so, they obtain a better appreciation of the roles and functions of innovation.

  • Taking the routine and mundane work out of people so that this could translated into spare time for them to look at the future instead of overly focus in dealing with the past in the 'now' space.

  • Giving people the freedom to experiment and space make errors and mistakes so that true learning could happen.

Innovative Organisations See the Larger Picture

Highly innovative organisations are capable of differentiating the larger picture of creating opportunities for the transference of learning from spending money mindlessly. They appreciate the full extent of the value creation process for investing in people and the amount of work involved, many which is beyond the scope of training and development, and the responsibilities of the trainers. They have avoided the zero-sum game of making the trainers the scapegoats for learning failures and went beyond managing the superficial aurora of learning successes.

Here is an interesting video that talk about giving people the opportunities to use their learned abilities:





Here are the links for the other critical factors of innovative organisations:

This article was 1st written on 19 May 2009 and 7 July 2010.
Copyright 2009 and 2010. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Managing Innovation at the Organisational Level

Strategic Importance of Innovation in Organisations

I have written much about the limitations of continuous improvement and the role of creativity in injecting new avenues of improvement into an organisation and in thinking outside the natural laws that govern the technologies that define a current produce, service or process.
Each time a new source of improvement or breakthrough is found, the propensity for innovations come into existence. The capability to identify this source and the capacity turn it into innovations is an advantage that organisations must afford to have in order to stay competitive.


From Managing Innovations to Managing the Engine that Creates Them

However, organisations cannot depend on a single improvement or innovation to stay competitive. In a dynamic market, competition is nearly perfect and organisations do not have long periods to enjoy the gains from their own innovation. The lifecycles of products, services and processes are getting shorter as more organisations have learnt to innovate and are capable of taking their own innovations to the market.

This means organisations need to move away from managing an innovation or a number of innovations; seeing them from conceptualisation to commercialisation, to managing the pipeline that creates these innovations. This is the engine that is capable of producing new innovation to replace the ones that are currently decaying in their lifecycles.

However, to manage innovation at this level, Organisational Development (OD) practitioners need to recognise the kinks in the pipeline. These kinks are the outputs of an overactive organisational immunity system working against all things that may create instability ln the organisation's current social order and topple its existing structures. This means, innovations do not flow through the organisation very well and regular interventions are needed to nudge the ideas and the innovations that come from them forward.

Seven Kinks of the Innovation Pipeline

Before we talk about the types of intervention, let's examine these seven kinks in the pipeline:

The Challenges of Imperfect Market

There are many individuals in organisations with ideas and solutions. Equally many are individuals looking for them. The challenge is that there is little knowledge in the market who and where these suppliers and buyers are and this create exchange inefficiencies in the organisational market of ideas and solutions.

Projectisation Challenges

Many ideas with breakthrough potentials are often given up because very few individuals are willing to stick their heads out to turn these into projects in order to draw value out of them. This does not mean that the motivation for enterprise is found lacking amongst the employees in the organisation. It suggests that people are turned off by the organisation's aversion towards uncertainty, its unforgiving nature towards failures, and an overly myopic focus on short-termism.

Challenges of Time and Space

Project teams face much inertia when they try to get their projects started. Some of these include finding the right members, right problem definition, and right range and scope. When things become tough, there is always a tendency for these teams to fall back on routine work methods and proven solutioning approaches, and symptomatic rather then underlying fundamentals issues get solved.

Challenges of Social Constraints

Research has revealed that leaders have the tendency to unknowingly introduce organisational and social constraints that prevent creativity and innovation to flourish in their own organisation.

Organisations may formulate and implement seemingly well meaning policies that have unexpected consequences that constraints the flow of ideas or innovations within the organisation. Organisations have both formal and informal structures that govern the distribution of power, influence and control between stakeholders. The flow of ideas and innovations in the organisation could be channelled or halted by these elements and the leaders needs to be sensitive to their use and the impact they create.

Challenges of Participation

Social interactions are always at the centre of creative ideas and innovations generation. The willingness of various players in innovation - the fund managers, entrepreneurs, protectors, advocators and promoter, to believe and participate in these interactions will determine the projects’ success.

Therefore, the quality and frequency of these interactions cannot be taken lightly and has to be cultivated over time. This requires the skills and acumen of the pipeline architects and the recognition that these players have to play two roles - the role of managing today and the responsibilities of managing for tomorrow now.

Challenges of Scarcity

The availability and accessibility to resources can make or break the project. Money is not the only resource teams need. They also need management approval, support and protection as these are capable of influencing the motivation, make-up and dynamics of the project team. Often, teams are frustrated and jaded because of the lack of such resources. Jaded individuals could create long term impact for the organisation as their existence always challenges the credibility and authenticity of management towards being an innovative organisation.

Challenges of Withholding Value

In a knowledge-based society, creativity and innovation is not constraint by the boundaries that separate spaces. Individuals and teams could choose not to contribute and they are equally capable of withholding the value of the innovation from the organisation and passing it someone they find worthy of receiving it. Individuals could start translating an idea created at one organisation in another. There is very little the organisation could do in terms of the policies that could be used to prevent the leakage of value from the organisation.

Managing Innovation in the Organisation is about Managing the Pipeline

It is therefore not surprising organisation has no problem recognised as being innovation when they managed these kinks well and those trying to be innovative find it to be a challenge to be one because they are doing the wrong things by copying them without understanding the underlying principles.

This article was 1st written on 29 April 2009 and updated on 15 May 2009.
Copyright 2009. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Space and Innovation, and their Relationship

Divisive Nature of Space on Wisdom

I have begun investigating into space and innovation, and their relationship in 2005. I believe that the way a space is configured at the workplace impacts the quantity and quality of creative ideas and commercially viable innovations produced by the organisation.

By dividing the space into smaller parcels and allocating these to different organisational stakeholders to facilitate labour division, specialisation and scaled economisation, people get divided and their collective institutional memory and tacit knowledge is also disaggregated, distributed and stove-piped within these pockets of space. While technology may support the retrieval, transmission, sharing and storage of information from and at different venues, the reintegration of these elements into their original whole and relaying it as wisdom between organisational members remains a challenging and costly affair for many practitioners of organisation development.
Politics are Built into the Space

The call for keeping wisdom centralised and intact comes from the recognition that innovation is a product of creativity that combines and recombines current wisdom into new forms of representation that transcend traditional arrangements and structures. This propensity to create is heightened when innovators gain access to a wider array of wisdom that exists in the various communities in the organisation. In a divided organisation, the dispensation of this wisdom is obstructed by the rights, influences and power one has over the wisdom in a broken-up space vis-à-vis some other spaces. While these are intangible, their physical representations like social boundaries, physical structures, and geographical time zones are. These barriers constraint the movement of people and the knowledge they carry. These undermine their chances of creating breakthrough ideas and innovations.

Channelling Causes the Creation of Dark Spaces

Inductively, one can conclude that there is an explicit and positive relationship between the configuration of space and the prospect of the organisation in producing innovations. The layout affects the movement of its occupants, who are the carriers of knowledge and wisdom in the organisation. This channelling effect determines the preferences of the occupants over the use of a certain passageway, corridor or access route. This means it is more by design than coincidence that the foci of a network and its social order is skewed towards those destinations where channelling plays a defining role in the given space.

Unlike explicit knowledge, which is observable, recordable and storable, tacit ones are more likely to be effectively transferred from one individual to another through interactions like conversation, discourse and collaborative work. The effects of channelling create pockets of vacuum in certain parts of the organisation where such interactions are disabled. These dark spaces lack the drawing power to bring in enough of people to generate the diversity necessary for wisdom to be created. They also provide little attraction to stem the flow of these resources out of the space. This makes the stay in the dark spaces short and this disables meaningful and fruitful interactions, which is essential in the creation of breakthrough ideas.


Limiting Factors - Scientific Management Principles

Nevertheless, the way businesses are structured today informs us that the artefacts of scientific management will continue to be the cornerstones of organisatíons. Productivity with labour division, controlled decentralisation, and scale economisation will remain the dominant forces in influencing the organisation of resources for competition. In the face of such an arrangement, innovation practitioners need to find creative solutions that allow them to leverage on the current sciences of organisation to cultivate ideas and harness them as commercially viable innovations. They need to create white clearings in the dark spaces.

A Toothless Elephants are Forever White

In the course of my work, I have worked with organisations keen in creating spaces for creativity and innovation. The experience has been mixed. I have come across organisations which had funded the building of innovation rooms for the sake of meeting some business excellence requirements without wanting to understand how the rooms were to be subsequently used. Many of their investments ended in waste and further development in this area was shelved given the rooms' low utilisation rates. Eventually, these white elephants were converted for other uses when new priorities surface.

The main reason for these failed experiments is not because of the shortage of space or people with knowledge and wisdom. It is the lack of sharewares that enable meaningful and fruitful conversations, discourses and discussions to take place in these spaces. When the interactions are not meaningful, participants cannot find the purpose and motivation for attending and participating in these wisdom engagement gatherings. Spaces provided for these gathering are eventually unused. With proper channelling and availability of sharewares, we have the ingredients to build white space, as opposed to dark spaces.

Wiring Up the Space

As early as 2006, experiments to hardwire sharewares into the organisation's white spaces had begun.

Plan-Do-Check-Act or PDCA is the mother of all problem solving sharewares. What does it actually do and why is it so important? A process is a mechanism that times the release of a number of problem solving or consensus building sharewares to the participants at the most appropriate moment. It is important to time their release because there is a need to account for the pace of the conversation and learning during participation and overcome the forming, storming, norming and performing stages of a team as it grows it knowledge and experience.

My early attempts were confined to incorporating accelerated solutioning processes into spaces like meeting and work rooms. Several approaches were contemplated at that time and the more concrete ones are presented below:

  • Hardwiring – This is the kind of wiring found in the iStudio of the Ministry of Education, where the innovation process described by John Kao was hardwired into the space. Here, the designer believes that breakthroughs could happen when participants experience total immersion in and strict in adhering to the prescribed process and hardwiring the process into the space guarantees such results. His process could be found scripted onto the walls and the fixtures are built and acquired to allow the participants to follow the given script.
  • Soft Wiring – This is the type of wiring that was adapted by the Ministry of Defence for its innovation rooms. The layout and fixtures are designed and acquired to create an environment that is suitable for a finite array of processes. We were able to accommodate a range of layouts within these definitions:
  • Very Soft Wiring – where the layout of the room could be copied from some where without the need to understand the influences and nuances of the process and environment on the team's performance.
  • Semi-Soft Wiring – where the layout of the room is configured around a generic team work methodology and could be used for a finite array of processes. Here the influences and nuances of the process and environment on the team's performance are broadly accounted for during design.
  • Softwiring – where the layout of the room is laid out around a particular category of team processes and could only be applied for a particular category of team work. Thus, if the room is fitted for prototyping, it could support all kinds of prototyping activities and nothing else. Here, the influences and environmental impact on team's performance are narrowly considered.
  • Flexible Wiring
    . This kind of wiring combines the benefits of both hardwiring and softwiring but uses different technologies to overcome the challenges experienced when switching between these two kinds of wiring. Technologies are used to make the switch seamless. Taking this a step further, flexibility wiring includes the ability to strip down a team process into specific components and to have these combined and recombined with other strip down components of other team-based processes to form new processes. Thus, the idea of creating self-contain modules from pieces taken from different team work methodologies and supporting their execution within the space is the main thrust in its design.

I have left the public service in February of 2007 and is unable to follow-up and learn more about the outcomes of these experimentation with spaces. However, I have heard of initial successes during the early day of their implementation.

This article was 1st written on 17 April 2009.
Copyright 2009. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Goal Setting – Charting Your Future for Successful Breakthroughs

There are two worlds that we need to effectively manage in our lives in order that we remain successful. One of these worlds is the present and the other is our future. Both of these worlds are interrelated. Our future can only be created from the present but rarely are we able to create our future when the present is messed up by our past.

This programme is designed to help you deal with your present by unhooking the things that happened in the past, which are holding and preventing you from move ahead in life. When you life is free of the shadows of the past, you could then begin to chart and building your future with the present as your starting point.

Course Objectives

At the end of the course, you are able to:

  • Manage your present with what you already have
  • Charting and build your future from the present

Course Outline

Part 1: Managing the Present with What You Already Have

We have everything at our disposal to make it in life. Didn’t we survive our last birthday? Aren’t we doing alright at the moment? However, ‘alright’ is not always better. It is always good to uncover the things that are holding us back so that we could do even better in life. Our lives could be built from learning and self-discoveries, and this is the true nature of life.

Something is Not Working – Using ‘Tension’ as an Early Warning Devise

There are occasions in our lives when everything seems to fall apart. Most of us confront them by adopting strategies that may alleviate the discomforts these occasions brought on to us. Others just run away believing that they would go away at some point of time. Seldom do we recognize that the stress we experience comes about because situations have changed and our major life strategies no longer work.

In this module, we will play a game called the ‘The Journey to Kinderland’. In the game we will learn to use our body to inform us of things that are not working properly.

Where is it Not Working – Identifying the Source of the Tension

When we know something is not working, we usually put in more effort, time and money to turn it around, only to be disappointed because things get from bad to worse. So, what is wrong here? Actually, nothing is wrong. We are just blinded to the source that creates these tensions.

In this segment, we will learn the source of our problem by uncovering the drivers that derail us from our happiness. We will complete the Personal Derailment Profile, which may point us to the specific drivers that are causing the stress in our lives.

Looking for the Gaps – Things that You Could Do

No future could be built at any other time but today. Therefore, understanding the concept of time is very important and the question we must ask is what we should do to move ahead in life.

In this module, we will learn the true nature of time and its impact on your future. We will also complete the Linking Skills Profile to discover the skill sets we need to make the future more precise.

Part 2: Working Your Future from the Present

Once we become aware of what is in the past that is ruining our present, we can now look at what we could do now to create our future.

Envisioning Your Future – Getting the Fog Out of the Way

We cannot talk about our future until we could see how it looks like. Once we have an image of the future, we get to be inspired by it, motivated by it, and our aspirations could propel us to great heights.

In this segment, we will spend time creating our own vision board. Through the board, we attempt to make as clear as possible our true desires and we represent these with pictures to enhance the clarity and impulse for them.

Translating Talk into Tangibles – Setting My Plans

We cannot talk about our future. It carries no value. We have to build our future from today, that is, it has to be now. This means that we need to have a plan. The plan calls on us to work towards a goal and it tells us if we are ahead or behind in our pace today into our future.

In this module, we will use a multitude of templates to work out a set of plans that we could implement immediately. If fact, we can begin to call on resources and support using the programme to kick-start our plan, inching a step towards fulfilling a breakthrough life. In order words, we are innovating our lives.

Breaking Out of the Box - Barriers to Your Innovated Life

'Think outside the box' is one of those management jargons that has been wildly circulated and widely used in many learning communities in the world.

But what does it really mean? What is the 'box' mentioned in the phrase? We have included an 'outside' in the maxim, how does the inside looks like? Since we know we need to 'think' to get out, then what kind of thinking should we use to do that?

In this module, we will learn the types of barriers we may be pre-disposed to and we will rely on the Opportunity-Obstacle Quotient Profile to gain this insight.

If you are keen to find out more about this programme, please contact Anthony Mok at spaceman@pacific.net.sg.

This article was 1st written on 17 April 2009 and updated on 22 Jun 2009.
Copyright 2009. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

System of Authentic Sharing

Critical Factors of Innovative Organisations No. 6

The networks in our community contain large reservoirs of information, experiences, knowledge and wisdom. In them, new perspectives are constantly being added to and insights are regularly being drawn from the collective membership of the community. In these networks, these sharing activities generate a higher propensity for individuals to see new connections that others cannot and with this ability, more breakthrough ideas could be produced.

No two networks are the same and not all kinds of network are capable of achieving this outcome. Networks, which members are highly mobile and possess good social interaction skills, tend to feel more empowered to share authentically in these social structures. They are also more capable of producing the outcomes described in the previous paragraph. Such dynamics do not happen overnight or by chance.

Conversation, verbal or written, is the start of all relationships, formal or otherwise. There are two pre-requisites for a good conversation - relationship and trust. When opportunities for prolonged conversations are missing, pairs, groups or teams of individuals cannot evolve from their formative-acquaintance form of relationship to reach a certain degree of normalcy where deeper forms of relationship and trust could be developed and built upon. When these are missing, the conversation stops and the network become dull and unsustainable. Since sharing takes place in conversations, the importance of engaging in good conversations becomes obvious.

In our society and organisation, we have what it takes to enable sharing. Much effort has been spent acquiring various technologies for sharing. These electronic-mechanical technologies include the whole array of input, distribution, storage, search, access and output devices where data, information and knowledge is collected, kept and shared.

In addition to these is another array of people-participation processes that could be used to bring people from different parts of the community or organisation to a single physical or digital location to create new data, information and knowledge. There are many such processes in the market and many go by their trade names of Knowledge Café, World Café, and Open Space Technology. However, these processes could be traced to the mother of all such people-participation processes of Consensus Workshop Methods and Focused Discussion Methods. These are collectively called Technology of Participation. For years, organisations have purchased and used these processes and the tools they offer in their value-creation operations.

However, organisations continue to report limited success in sharing and creating new knowledge even after amassing this amount of hardware and process-ware to enable sharing. Why is this so? The problem lays on the lack of a kind of software that enables authentic share; sharing that is built on relationship and trust. Communities and organisations need people-interaction software. The two key ingredients in this software are the art of inquiry and the language of sharing.

In the Art of Inquiry, participants in the sharing session are triggered to think, reflect and respond to a line of questions from different genres. This line of questions could be delivered in succession or presented together. The objective is to focus the participants to commit their thinking capability and capacity to a common space so that enough of thoughts could be generate for sharing later. In the Language of sharing, we recognise that honest sharing only becomes possible when participants are warmed up to each other and trust is present in the session. This language seeks to build what is necessary to strengthen, clarify and authentic the thoughts of an on-going conversation so that they are accurately communicated and understood by all parties.

Here is a video that talks about innovation and networks:



The organisation that has pieced together these electronic-mechanical hardware, people-participation processes and people-interaction software seamlessly, possesses the system for honest sharing and this is a competitive advantage of an innovative organisation in the market.

Here are the links to the other factors of Innovative Organisations:

This article was 1st written on 24 Mar 2009 and updated on 7 Jul 2010.

Copyright 2009 & 2010. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.