Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Propensity to Innovation Self-Assessment Tool

Self-Assessment Tool

Ideas are the source of improvements, innovations and inventions. However, some ideas may take more effort to generate, are difficult to come by, and more valuable than others.

Here is a simple self-assessment instrument which may help you uncover the innovation attitude you have towards a type of ideas and a step in the innovation process.

This article was 1st written on 6 Nov 2012.
Copyright 2012. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, February 06, 2013

Propensity to Innovation


Effects of Attitude on Innovation

Ideas are the source of improvements, innovations and inventions. However, some ideas may take more effort to generate, are difficult to come by, and more valuable than others.

Classes of Ideas

Ideas could be categorised in the four classes. These are:

·         Efficient Ideas

This class of ideas helps us do the right thing and do them the right way. These ideas do not call us to challenge or substantially change the organisation’s current processes. They usually lead to incremental changes and are unlikely to be noticed by people outside of the organisation.

·         Refining Ideas

This class of ideas helps us do things better. We want to know if ‘there is a better way of achieving the same output?’ It looks at the means and not the end itself. Since only the ways a service or product is delivered are changed, people external of the organisation may not be aware of the change.

·         Adopting Ideas

This class of ideas helps us do things in the ways others are doing. There is no shame in borrowing ideas from other organisations or industries, and adapting them in our organisations. Many of such ideas are known to us as best practices and they inform us of the proven ideas that usually work in the structures of a given context.

·         Different Ideas

This class of ideas helps us do things in ways that no one else has done before. These are truly radical ideas that have not been thought of before or have not been successfully implemented in the past. These ideas are usually the most difficult to execute since they are the first of their kind and they demand radical changes in the organisations. However, once they are successfully implemented, they are also the ones that deliver the most benefit and value to our organisations.

Innovation Process

Innovation does not exist out of the blue. It goes through phases of identifying and turning ideas into innovations that change our current circumstances.

A typical innovation process usually has four generic phases. These are:

·         Define Phase

Problem is defined as a state of difficulty, and  goal of innovation is to change this state. Therefore, if we can find the problem, we could find the opportunities where innovations could become handy. This kind of problems is called propportunities.

·   To do this, we must have a good appreciation our surrounding environment and clear understanding of the problems that exist in this space. In this phase, we generate the definitions and specifications of the problem, and reach a general consensus on them before making attempts to solve it.

·         Discover Phase

The source of Innovation is ideas.

There are two rules in the Discover Phase. These are suppressing our judging faculty temporarily and spending sufficient of time in generating alternative options. In this way, we give exploration a chance to populate the discourse with enough of ideas for the next phase of the innovation process.

·         Decide Phase

All ideas have the potential of creating a breakthrough, but some point, we will have to decide on the idea that is most likely to succeed at a cost that is most manageable. The flexibility and range for executing this phase depends a lot on the quality and quantity of ideas generated in the previous phase.

·         Deliver Phase

There is no breakthrough when there is no innovation.

The instrument for change is by making the innovation a reality; by creating and delivering the solution to users who need it. No all innovations will deliver immediate breakthroughs, and will need us to make refinements to them. To do this, we need to revisit the preceding phases to identify the sources of failure.

Choices and Personality

The choices we make when participating in innovation can be influenced by our personalities.

In brief, there are two basic kinds of cognitive ‘functions’ which guide the way we:

·         Take in information (Sensing (S) or iNtuiting (N)) to understand things around us, and

·         Make decisions (Thinking (T) or Feeling (F)) based on the information we have gathered.

There are also two different temperaments which we exhibit. We either show:

·       Extroversion (E), where we operate in the external world of behaviours, actions, people, and things, or

·         Introversion (I), where we operate in the internal world of ideas and reflection.

There is a ‘Lifestyle’ dimension in this model. We either have a preference for:

·         Judging (J), where we want things to be planned, stable and organised, or

·         Perceiving (P), where we like to ‘go with the flow’ and respond to situations as they appear.

Each of these preferences points to a character in the alphabet, which in combination forms a four-character code that informs us about our personality.

Personality and Innovation

Some people are more capable of generating a class of ideas and find it easier to navigate through a particular phase of the Innovation Process. We call this inclination our ‘Innovation Attitude’.

The 2nd and 4th character in our personality type indicator code inform us of our innovation attitude. This is the preference that influences why we are attracted a type of ideas, how we define a problem, and how we are likely to act during the innovation process. The code containing the:

·        'SJ' character suggests the innovation attitude of 'Efficiency'.

Precise information and timing is critical to SJians. For them, Sensing is introverted. They draw and use information from their own knowledge and experience bases to assess and judge their situations. They are likely to seek innovative ideas that create greater efficiencies and improve effectiveness.

·        'SP' character suggests the innovation attitude of 'Refining'.

SPians are pre-disposed to experience the world with their senses. For them, Sensing is extroverted. In wanting to engage the people around them and to feel the variety of experiences their surroundings have to offer, they will operate in this external space to collect as much information as possible and respond to the situation accordingly. They are drawn to innovative ideas that can help them refine and adapt their current realities to continue enjoying these experiences. However, for them it also involves not doing something.

·       'NJ' character suggests the innovation attitude of 'Adopting'.

NJians understand that the time they need to convert their internal ideas to external realities is scarce, and will plan and organise ways to execute their insights to reduce loss. For them, Intuition is introverted, and they are likely to sort ideas internally, especially in terms of their importance and urgency to what is valued. Typically, NJians will borrow ideas from outside their sphere of influence, and adopt what can be applied, and innovate what cannot be accordingly.

·        'NP' character suggests the innovation attitude of 'Different'.

Connecting people to emerging potential concepts and ideas to generate possibilities is what keeps the NPians going. For them, Intuition is extroverted, and they see alternatives as life bloods in a world of interactions. In this space, NPians seek out ideas that are original – that are different from what are already out there are better informed about the potential we can tap on and the choices we can make while navigating through our innovative organisation and its processes.

Successful innovation teams have a healthy balance of these four innovation attitudes in its members. This way, each member, whose innovation attitude is need the most at a particular stage of developing an innovation, could be called to come forward to lead the teams and seek the breakthrough they need to move the project forward.

This article was 1st written on 8 Aug 2012.
Copyright 2012. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Supporting and Resourcing for Innovation


Definitions of Innovation

When someone was asked what innovation is, we typically would hear people describing it as something unique, breaking through, and valuable.

However, there are over 60 different ways of defining innovation, and together, they share six broad themes. 

Innovation:

·  Could occur anywhere in our society, in any part of our organisations, and even in our daily lives. As long as there is a problem that does not go away, an unusual approach will be needed to change the situation

·  May come in different shapes and sizes to bridge different expectation and performance gaps so that stakeholders could receive greater returns in the things they want accomplished with what they have

·      Requires different types of social actors who would use personal techniques, methods and processes to navigate the innovation through the systems

·    Demands repeated and differentiated quantities and qualities of tangible and intangible resources and support to empower and enable these social actors into bringing movement in the work they attempt to accomplish

·       May spends indefinite amount of time traversing sequentially and laterally through the many stages of its creative and innovation life-cycle

·   Delivers different types of value to meet different aims of individuals, communities and societies 

Given these attributes, a more integrated definition [1] of innovation has been proposed, which describes innovation as ‘the multi-stage process whereby organisations transform ideas into new or improved products, service or processes, in order to differentiate, compete and advance themselves successfully in their marketplace’.

The definition implies that organisations should not rely on a single innovation or keep innovating on a single entity to stay competitive. It means they need to move away from managing an innovation or a number of innovations to managing the pipeline, and the engine that lies within, that creates these innovations. 

Innovation Pipeline and Its Kinks

However, to manage innovation at this level, Organisation leaders need to recognise the kinks in the pipeline; the seven choke points of the engine. These
kinks are the products of organisations reacting to things which they see as agents that upset the organisations’ existing social order.
Briefly, these kinks are the:

·         Challenge of Exchange Deficiencies

There are many individuals in organisations that are producing and owning ideas and solutions. Equally, are many who look for these to close their performance gaps. However, it is the need to account for the performance, which gaps these innovations could close, that is the reason few opportunities for sharing of information on the whereabouts, needs and offerings between these two sets of social actors - the fund managers, entrepreneurs, protectors, advocators and promoter, exist. These create deficiencies in the exchange of ideas and innovations within these organisations.

·         Projectisation Challenges

Often, the organisations' aversion to uncertainty, unforgiving nature towards failures, and overly myopic focus on short-termism, turn the most motivated and innovative individuals off.

Many ideas with breakthrough potentials are given up because very few individuals are willing to stick their heads out to turn these into projects to draw value out of them.

As the project moves through its life-cycle, this phenomenal prevails. It continues to prevent people, who may have specific competencies to bring best out of the project, thereby reducing the propensity of the project truly reaching its innovation success.

·         Challenges of Time and Space

There is inertia to start innovating; getting the right problem definitions, finding their right scope and range, and locating the right social actors.

In a world where we have to struggle with doing things that provide for us today, and having things that may not even pay tomorrow, the going of moving ideas beyond their drawing boards could be tough.

These conditions create tendencies for social actors to fall back on their routine work methods and proven solutioning approaches to avoid spending precious resources on the fundamentally more challenging issues just to get things by.

·         Kinks of Social Constraints

The innovation success of organisations is positively related on the quantity and quality of ‘intrapreneurs’ that they possess.

However, social actors have known to introduce policies or encourage practices that, while well-meant and intended, restrict and constraint the ways ‘intraprenuer’ may use to organise their workplace.

Besides introducing these cultural norms, social actors reinforce them. In the world of measurements and accountability, they formally and informally sanction behaviours that are deemed unacceptable, thereby reducing the space in which diversity could work and where quality could really matter at the workplace. What has started as expected control, has unexpectedly reduced the willingness of ‘intrapreneurs’ wanting to fill pipeline with ideas and innovations, and their number wanting to remain behind to operate it.

·         Challenges of Participation 

At the heart of creation are the interactions social actors have with each other on matters relating to its vision, intention and direction. Without their willingness to come together to make meanings that touch, inspire and move others into working for and with the venture, the innovation is dead.

Therefore, the quality and frequency of these interactions matters and cannot be taken lightly. These could be cultivated, but they require the acumen and skills of pipeline architects to recognise the social actors and understand the importance of their conversations to lead them into playing their most important function in the creation process - managing the affairs of today so that tomorrow has a chance begin now. However, in a space where today is awarded a premium over tomorrow, this chance for breakthroughs is narrower. 

·         Challenges of Scarcity 

Usually, we would conclude that money is the panacea for innovation. While this is essential in buying us the material to build the innovation, it does not always buy us the approval, protection, and support necessary to introduce and sustain the innovation in the organisations.

Innovation is about change, and change demands, firstly, shifts in mind-sets, and secondly, modifications in behaviours. These are challenging endeavours, which require the act of leadership.

Intangible resources are capable of influencing the make-up, motivation, and dynamics of social actors coming together and working in the pipeline. Often, actors feel frustrated and become jaded when they have difficulties accessing these ingredients for success. Jaded actors could impact the pipeline negatively as their very existence will always put into question the credibility and authenticity of management in wanting to build a more innovative organisation. 

·         Challenges of Withholding Value 

In a knowledge-based society, creativity and innovation is not constraint by the boundaries that divide space and time. Individuals and teams could choose not to contribute since they are capable of withholding the value of the innovation from the organisation and passing it someone whom they find worthy of receiving it. Individuals could start translating a conceptualised idea that has taken place at one organisation in another.

There is very little the organisation could do in terms of the policies that it could use to prevent the leakage of value from the organisation. 

Organisation that does not use a humane and inclusive approach to managing its human resource practice that build rapport, trust and relationships, these are the investments that 

Means

Organisation members are unlikely to use their own pocket money to create innovations for their organisations. Highly innovative organisations recognise this and provide the means – resources and the support, for their members to innovate.

By laying the common themes found in the definitions of innovation on the kinks that are found in the innovation pipeline, we could discern the nuances of a meaningful framework for resourcing innovation. The goal is to stave the kinks by resourcing and supporting the alternatives.

Presented below is one of the Innovation Pipeline Performance Metric and Intervention Rubrics -

Challenge of Exchange Deficiencies


Please contact ThinkInnovation, the People Behind Your Breakthroughs, at thinkinnovation@ymail.com for the full version of the Innovation Pipeline Performance Metric and Intervention Rubrics.

Reflection and Discussion

After reading this case - 'The Specialty Group', reflect on the following questions:

1.  What are the broad themes of innovation for The Specialty Group?

2.  What are the kinks in the company’s innovation Pipeline?

3.  How does the company manage these kinks?

This article was 1st written on 8 Nov 2012.
Copyright 2012. Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.


[1]   Baregheh, A. Rowley, J., and Sambrook, S. (2009). “Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation”, Management Decision, Vol. 47(8), pp. 1323-1339.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Constraints of Decisions on Free Will


Active Listening Series #10

We are taught to believe that we are free to live our lives.

‘But are we free to choose what we want in our lives?’ I asked Jamie one day.

He looked at me and replied, ‘Of course! I am free to do anything.’

So, I proposed that we do an experiment to see if we are really that free.

‘Sure!’ he replied.

‘Which fruit do you like the most?’ I asked casually.

His reply was mango.

‘Let me rephrase my question again. Which is your favorite fruit - mango or grapes?’ I asked again.

‘Mango’, he answered.

‘You choose mango because……’, I paused to let Jaime finish the sentence.

He came back with, ‘I choose mango because it is delicious.'

‘I do not think you are choosing’, I replied.

Jaime looked puzzled.

Choices Are Not Decisions

‘Do you like me define for you the difference between ‘making choices’ and ‘making decisions?’’ I asked, trying to look helpful.

Jaime nodded, and I continued.

When we make a decision, we identify all the available options, we weigh them for their potential pros and cons, evaluate them for their probable implications, examine them for their likely consequences, and finally, we will pick the option that gives us the best value and comes with the least troubles.
In making a choice, we look at all the options and we pick one.

‘Let's continue with our little experiment. Mango or grapes? Choose!’ I asked Jaime again.

‘Mango!’ He replied, and I followed for the reasons of his selection, and they are nutritional values and delightful taste.

‘I am afraid that you are still making a decision and not a choice’, I concluded.

Decisions and Zero Chance Lives

Jaime looked quizzingly at me and demanded an explanation. I decided to share with him the relationship between free will and ‘zero chance’ lives.

I have shared that a decision is made after we have considered the options while choice is just about picking an option without considering.

In the space of making choices, there is no room for reasons, justifications, or becauses. So, when we pick 'Mango', there are no 'becauses' for wanting it. We just choose it, and that is it. This is the characteristic of free will.

However, when we are considering something, we become the subjects of its encumbrances, and are less likely to take chances. Towards this end, we play no games with our future, and end up leading zero chance lives.

Deeper Understanding of Free Will

'I understand you now. I choose Mango and that is it!' Jaime confidently proclaimed.

'Good! Now, try this. Grapes, choose?' I shot back immediately.

Jaime gave me an hard look, and protested, 'But grapes are not my favorite fruit! How am I going to choose?'

'Why not?' and I reminded Jaime, 'What does making choices really mean to you again?'

Jaime replied, 'It is when there are no reasons. I have chosen what I had chosen'.
'I can see that you have gotten it. Let's apply it! Grapes, choose!' I repeated.

Jaime paused for a moment and shouted, 'I got it! I got it now!' and I can see the ‘Eureka’ moment hanging on his face.

'So tell me more', I followed on the moment.

'I really have never given grapes a chance', he concluded.

I asked, 'How is this so?'

'I have never chosen grapes because of all the 'becauses', and in doing so, I have actually never given the fruit a chance', was Jaime's response.

'Not only have you not given grape a chance, what else have you not given a chance as well?' I continued to coach.

Jaime had taken another long pause and replied, 'myself', and he gave me a look, and continued, 'since I have not given grapes a chance in my life, I have no chance of finding out how enjoyable grapes could have been', he went on, 'Actually, I have not given my life a chance, and basically leading a 'zero chance' life! Gosh! This is terrible!' he concluded.

I encouraged, 'All is not lost. Now that you have become aware, what can you do about it?'

'I will give grapes a chance!' Jaime said.

'How about the other parts of your life? How would this insight change you?' I queried.

'I guess I need not have to give myself reasons for denying me from freely enjoying the world around me', he concluded.

And I nodded in totally agreement.

This article was 1st written on 19 Dec 2012.
Copyright 2012. 
Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Empowering Nature of a Request


Active Listening Series No. 9

In the late of one September night, Aidan whatsapped me and lamented that he was feeling stressed and exhausted, and regretting  for doing his post-graduate studies as a part-time student.

'What's up?’ I typed into my iPhone.

'I have an assignment, which I need to hand to the University this morning, and am not even midway into it, and now I have to beat the five-hour deadline. It is a struggle every night in the past week, and its effects is felt every morning at work! It is worse than a hangover!', he cried over across the screen.

'This sounds like the experience that you had when you were completing the last assignment, isn't it? How did you manage?’ I return the message.

'Yes! But this is more painful. Maybe, I should throw the towel in the ring.’ he emoticoned in tears and continued, ‘It was into the eleventh hour that I had submitted the last assignment and I had fallen sick after that.'

'This sounds bad,' I empathised and added, 'but how do you feel about the experience?'

'Disempowering! I have to forego everything! My gym sessions! My rest! I practically give up my personal life! I feel imprisoned!', he exclaimed.

'I understand how you feel,' acknowledging his trial and tribulations and added 'But I doubt you have fully exhausted your options?'

'What other options do I have but to meet the deadline?’ he shot back.

'Well, you have not made a request yet', I ventured.

'A request?’ he queried,

'Well, what could you request of the University?’ I asked.

'I could request for an extension?’ he replied.

'Yes.', I followed through.

'But.....!’ he shouted from the other side of the application.

I remained quiet, not wanting to encourage or acknowledge his feelings and emotions.

'But the University will not agree to the request! Besides, I may end up getting less marks', he justified the status-quo.

'Aren't you making a conclusion ahead of the facts?’ I pointed out where he was heading.

'I understand what you mean. I know what I am thinking of is not grounded in reality. What is real is when the Administration comes back informing me of the outcome. That's real', he added.

'Yeah. Your disempowerment is a result of not acting. You need more time but you are not asking. You feel disempowered because you are not in action!', I explained.

You see, we feel constrained much of our lives not because we are really constraint by our circumstances but because we talk ourselves into believing that our world is a constraining one, and our talk keeps us out of action.
 
In this space of inaction, we become truly disempowered. Our inaction activates no one into action and so no one comes to attend to our needs. Since we have not given anyone a chance to help us out of our situation, we also end up disenfranchising those who could act in their own ways to unconstrained us. This is the vicious cycle of disempowerment.

'So, what would you want to do now?’ I asked.

'Well, I think I should give the University a chance to help me. I will write them now and ask for an extension. Then, I am going to sleep. I really need the rest', Aidan proposed.

'Cool! Looks like you have a plan. Okay. It is getting late. I hear from you soon.', and I shut down my apps.

'Thank you.’ the apps notified back as I prepare to sleep.

This article was 1st written on 28 Nov 2012.
Copyright 2012. 
Anthony Mok. All Rights Reserved.